Victims Takes Sides on Asbestos Bill Debate
Article Added February 8th, 2006 - Print This Story - Bookmark This Story
Tuesday saw military vets and asbestos-poisoned victims on Capitol Hill taking a stand for or against the compensation bill that a Senate vote was polling that day. Aides announced to the waiting spectators that the outcome was too close to call.
The fibrous material collectively called asbestos was used for years in insulation and machine parts until it was discovered that the flame retardant substance was linked to breathing and lung diseases, including cancer and emphysema. The hundreds of thousands of claims have clogged the legal system and bankrupted over 70 companies in the US. The bill would establish a trust fund to handle settlements for asbestos victims while protecting companies from further litigation. Aides from both sides of the debate have refused to predict an outcome.
While those that are against say that the bill would prevent victims from seeking restitution by other means than the fund, representatives of veteran groups said this was the only way vets could find restitution. This is because the vets cannot sue their former employer – the US military – for exposure that happened in military compounds. Veterans make up 25% of those claiming restitution. Contention has been running high between those that support the bill (victims and legislators alike) and those that feel the bill falls short. Even if the final tally shows approval, other hurdles will need to be satisfied before the fund would be available for disbursement.
Article Added February 8th, 2006 - Print This Story - Bookmark This Story
Looking for a Washington DC Mesothelioma Lawyer? Click Here.
- Ron Eddins, Founding Partner
View archived Asbestos and Mesothelioma articles below:
